This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption!


On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> > changes shouldn't affect code generation, so finding the first place code 
> > generation changes between the before and after compilers might help.
> 
> What exactly you mean by code generation?  Apparently the gimple is
> different in a way that there are fewer conversions that in turn changes
> optimizer decisions, right?  So both RTL and gimple should be
> different...

There should be fewer different types with the same width, so fewer 
conversions among such types - but such types are effectively identical 
for code generation purposes, so the conversions ought to be eliminated at 
an early stage and make no difference to subsequent optimizer decisions.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]