This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 12 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-05-27T17:27:36Z.

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org, roger at eyesopen dot com, mrs at apple dot com, aj at suse dot de, cgd at broadcom dot com, kazu at cs dot umass dot edu, ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org, rmathew at hotmail dot com, nathan at codesourcery dot com, bkoz at redhat dot com, Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr, zlaski at apple dot com
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 10:01:53 -0700
Subject: Re: 12 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-05-27T17:27:36Z.
References: <20050528112111.56AD117AB7F7F@gcc-regress.apple.com> <7ac2bd603612c50c941415f457c611f2@physics.uc.edu>

Andrew Pinski wrote:

On May 28, 2005, at 7:21 AM, GCC regression checker wrote:

With your recent patch, GCC HEAD has some regression test failures,
which used to pass.  There are 1 new failures, and 11
failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
have been fixed.

The new failures are:
native libstdc++.sum 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc

Can you see what's different about how this file is being compiled now than it was before? For build-tree testing, there should have been no change in the results, because the same flags are being passed. I saw no changes on my system in this test. What's different on yours?

However, this is a test which is known to reveal a bug/inconsistency in either the library or PCH, in that it does behave differently with and without PCH.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- 12 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-05-27T17:27:36Z.
  - From: GCC regression checker
- Re: 12 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-05-27T17:27:36Z.
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]