This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC build of HEAD failed for native with your patch on2005-02-13T15:03:19Z.

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, phython at gcc dot gnu dot org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org, kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:13:31 -0500
Subject: Re: GCC build of HEAD failed for native with your patch on2005-02-13T15:03:19Z.
References: <20050213165337.AFC0815252EF2@gcc-regress.apple.com><f9b02c03b87f4bc3a77a33cb52ff26b0@physics.uc.edu>

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:56:06 -0500, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> wrote:

> On Feb 13, 2005, at 11:53 AM, GCC regression checker wrote:
>
>> With your recent patch, GCC HEAD does not compile on:
>>  native
>> Attached is build output for those targets.
>>
>> The build failures are new.
>>
>> For more information, see http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/.
>
> This was caused by:
> +2005-02-13  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>

Reverted for the moment.  They bootstrapped and tested cleanly on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, but x86 has looser alignment requirements than most
targets nowadays.

Could you check that the gimplify_modify_expr_rhs/CALL_EXPR change
bootstraps cleanly on darwin?

Thanks,
Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC build of HEAD failed for native with your patch on 2005-02-13T15:03:19Z.
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- GCC build of HEAD failed for native with your patch on 2005-02-13T15:03:19Z.
  - From: GCC regression checker
- Re: GCC build of HEAD failed for native with your patch on 2005-02-13T15:03:19Z.
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]