This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

GCC memory consumption increased by recent patch!


Hi,
Comparing memory consumption on compilation of combine.i and generate-3.4.ii I got:


comparing combine.c compilation at -O0 level:
    Overall memory needed: 24637k -> 24645k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 9351k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 8665k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 2864k
    Garbage: 41665k
    Leak: 6387k
    Overhead: 5772k
    GGC runs: 328

comparing combine.c compilation at -O1 level:
    Overall memory needed: 25497k -> 25509k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 9228k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 8733k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 2027k -> 2029k
    Garbage: 61218k -> 61220k
    Leak: 6749k
    Overhead: 9980k -> 9981k
    GGC runs: 503

comparing combine.c compilation at -O2 level:
    Overall memory needed: 29545k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 12663k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 12537k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 2596k -> 2597k
    Garbage: 79478k -> 79464k
    Leak: 6585k
    Overhead: 14136k -> 14132k
    GGC runs: 516

comparing combine.c compilation at -O3 level:
  Amount of memory still referenced at the end of compilation increased from 7074k to 7091k, overall 0.24%
    Overall memory needed: 20176k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 12794k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 12537k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 3407k -> 3409k
    Garbage: 107420k -> 107415k
    Leak: 7074k -> 7091k
    Overhead: 18944k -> 18946k
    GGC runs: 582 -> 583

comparing insn-attrtab.c compilation at -O0 level:
    Overall memory needed: 114136k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 74739k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 45485k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 39340k
    Garbage: 152660k
    Leak: 10976k
    Overhead: 19969k
    GGC runs: 273

comparing insn-attrtab.c compilation at -O1 level:
    Overall memory needed: 124884k -> 124268k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 78748k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 70095k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 40765k -> 40779k
    Garbage: 367812k -> 366122k
    Leak: 11353k
    Overhead: 69563k -> 69302k
    GGC runs: 399 -> 396

comparing insn-attrtab.c compilation at -O2 level:
    Overall memory needed: 149040k -> 149044k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 98349k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 83466k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 39253k -> 39384k
    Garbage: 482425k -> 480608k
    Leak: 11234k
    Overhead: 84837k -> 84551k
    GGC runs: 342 -> 341

comparing insn-attrtab.c compilation at -O3 level:
    Overall memory needed: 149028k -> 147396k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 98351k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 83467k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 39254k -> 39385k
    Garbage: 483475k -> 481656k
    Leak: 11273k -> 11273k
    Overhead: 84987k -> 84702k
    GGC runs: 348 -> 347

comparing Gerald's testcase PR8361 compilation at -O0 level:
    Overall memory needed: 111092k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 86885k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 85935k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 19282k
    Garbage: 245826k
    Leak: 55495k
    Overhead: 43290k
    GGC runs: 367

comparing Gerald's testcase PR8361 compilation at -O1 level:
    Overall memory needed: 103689k -> 103701k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 85967k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 84933k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 18946k
    Garbage: 445680k -> 445582k
    Leak: 56767k -> 56775k
    Overhead: 65545k -> 65538k
    GGC runs: 526

comparing Gerald's testcase PR8361 compilation at -O2 level:
    Overall memory needed: 104737k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 85967k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 84933k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 18945k
    Garbage: 488587k -> 488583k
    Leak: 57372k -> 57372k
    Overhead: 75281k -> 75284k
    GGC runs: 584

comparing Gerald's testcase PR8361 compilation at -O3 level:
    Overall memory needed: 112433k -> 112429k
    Peak memory use before GGC: 92707k
    Peak memory use after GGC: 86227k
    Maximum of released memory in single GGC run: 19713k
    Garbage: 504574k -> 504623k
    Leak: 57528k -> 57523k
    Overhead: 76988k -> 76998k
    GGC runs: 569

Head of changelog is:

--- /usr/src/SpecTests/sandbox-britten-memory/x86_64/mem-result/ChangeLog	2005-02-01 21:04:36.000000000 +0000
+++ /usr/src/SpecTests/sandbox-britten-memory/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog	2005-02-02 02:52:11.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,29 @@
+2005-02-02  Joseph S. Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>
+
+	PR other/15514
+	* doc/gcov.texi: Fix typo.
+
+2005-02-01  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com
+
+	PR target/19680
+	* config/i386/i386.h (MODES_TIEABLE_P): Use ix86_modes_tieable_p.
+	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok): Change return
+	type to bool.
+	(ix86_tieable_integer_mode_p, ix86_modes_tieable_p): New.
+	* config/i386/i386-protos.h: Update.
+
+2005-02-01  Steven Bosscher  <stevenb@suse.de>
+
+	PR tree-optimization/19217
+	* tree-cfg.c (verify_expr): Use the data field to see if TP was
+	seen inside a PHI node.  Do not do the ADDR_EXPR check if it was.
+	(verify_stmts): Pass (void*)1 as data to verify_expr to signal
+	that it is walking a PHI node.
+
+2005-02-01  Joseph S. Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>
+
+	* doc/extend.texi (Nested Functions): Update.
+
 2005-02-01  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
 
 	PR 19696

I am friendly script caring about memory consumption in GCC.  Please contact
jh@suse.cz if something is going wrong.

The results can be reproduced by building compiler with
--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats targetting x86-64 and compiling preprocessed
combine.c or testcase from PR8632 with:

-fmem-report --param=ggc-min-heapsize=1024 --param=ggc-min-expand=1 -Ox -Q

The memory consumption summary appears in the dump after detailed listing of
the places they are allocated in.  Peak memory consumption is actually computed
by looking for maximal value in {GC XXXX -> YYYY} report.

Yours testing script.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]