This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 8 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-01-30T22:47:20Z.

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: bdavis at gfortran dot org, kazu at cs dot umass dot edu, pcarlini at suse dot de, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:30:36 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: 8 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-01-30T22:47:20Z.
References: <20050131121325.5F3DA14C74B7A@gcc-regress.apple.com>

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, GCC regression checker wrote:

With your recent patch, GCC HEAD has some regression test failures,
which used to pass.  There are 1 new failures, and 7
failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
have been fixed.

The new failures are:
native libstdc++.sum 21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/1.cc

I don't believe this was me:

PASS: 21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/1.cc (test for excess errors)

(that's on x86, though)

Attachment: ChangeLog.diff
Description: Text document

-- 
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com> 
(via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)

References:
- 8 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-01-30T22:47:20Z.
  - From: GCC regression checker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]