This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: new FAILs on HEAD
- From: Michael Ritzert <gcc at server2 dot mailsys dot de>
- To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: roger at eyesopen dot com
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:43:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: new FAILs on HEAD
- References: <20041211174001.GA49490@server2.mailsys.de>
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Michael Ritzert wrote:
> These new FAILs appeared since the last run:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr18921-1.c execution test
>
> These are the new ChangeLog entries since the last run:
>
It seems the ChangeLog was not yet committed when the regression tester
updated the tree. The next set of ChangeLog differences contains
> 2004-12-11 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
>
> PR middle-end/18921
> * fold-const.c (fold_unwidened_comparison): Use omit_one_operand
> instead of constant_boolean_node as arg0 may have side-effects.
>
0a1,5
> 2004-12-11 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
>
> PR middle-end/18921
> * gcc.dg/pr18921-1.c: New test case.
Michael