Re: 19 GCC HEAD regressions, 8 new, with your patch on 2004-08-31T04:08:43Z.

[Andrew Pinski <apinski at apple dot com>]

On Aug 31, 2004, at 2:24 PM, GCC regression checker wrote:

> With your recent patch, GCC HEAD has some regression test failures,
> which used to pass.  There are 8 new failures, and 11
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The new failures are:
> native g++.sum g++.dg/rtti/typeid4.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.jason/template24.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg8.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh2.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/net34.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb115.C
> native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb77.C


Reverting this patch:
+2004-08-30  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
+
+	* class.c (build_base_path): Use build_address directly.
+	* typeck.c (build_unary_op): Don't lower &a.b to pointer
+	arithmetic directly.
+	* typeck2.c (store_init_value): Don't assume !TREE_CONSTANT
+	means !initializer_constant_valid_p.

Fixes the problem.

The type of failure is we are calling into a vtable for some reason.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski