This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 28 GCC HEAD regressions, 7 new, with your patch on 2004-06-03T00:30:06Z.
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, rodimina at redhat dot com, jh at suse dot cz, austern at apple dot com, kazu at cs dot umass dot edu, tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de, stevenb at suse dot de, echristo at redhat dot com, jason at redhat dot com, zlaski at apple dot com
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 10:39:59 -0400
- Subject: Re: 28 GCC HEAD regressions, 7 new, with your patch on 2004-06-03T00:30:06Z.
- References: <20040603134113.7F13DF3931F3@gcc-regress.apple.com>
On Jun 3, 2004, at 09:41, GCC regression checker wrote:
The new failures are:
native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh31.C
native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/init1.C
native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p2736.C
native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p9706.C
native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C
native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.pt/overload11.C
All of the above failures are target bugs in the darwin
back-end and can be fixed by applying the rest of
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00113.html>.
native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.other/builtins9.C
This is a bug in the C++ front-end where there are two decls
for some reason. One for the builtin function and one for the
function that is there in the code. One way to fix this is to
do what the C front does and only combine the decls.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski