This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3 GCC regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2003-07-30T23:12:44Z.
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu,uweigand at de dot ibm dot com
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 22:45:48 +0200
- Subject: Re: 3 GCC regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2003-07-30T23:12:44Z.
- References: <200307310712.h6V7CrDm002339@gcc-regress.apple.com> <jmu192xwau.fsf@desire.geoffk.org>
> "GCC regression checker" <geoffk@apple.com> writes:
>
> > With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> > used to pass. There are 1 new failures, and 2
> > failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> > have been fixed.
> >
> > The new failures are:
> > native gcc.sum gcc.misc-tests/mg.c
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> This must be yours, due to:
>
> +Thu Jul 31 01:04:19 CEST 2003 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
> +
> + * gcse.c (insert_store): Fix typo in previous patch.
>
> Can you try to work out what's going wrong?
I would be quite surprised as the patch just avoids case where we would
abort later. I broke bootstrap by the original patch as it missed two
brackets (I was retyping it by hand, oops) so it is probably one of the
earlier patches. I will try to figure out later, but probably not
today.
Honza
>
> --
> - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>