This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-07-09T09:41:45Z.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, dave dot anglin at nrc-cnrc dot gc dot ca, konqueror at gmx dot de, neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:24:07 -0400
Subject: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-07-09T09:41:45Z.

On Wednesday, Jul 9, 2003, at 19:21 US/Eastern, Jan Hubicka wrote:

That what I expected, but wasn't able to locate the exact spot where
operand is missed.
"build_min" in the cases that don't need it, in case you're worried.)
I am betting that this patch will fix it.  Would you try that?  If it
works, check it in -- or ask me to do so.  Thanks for the help!
Yes, it works on the testcase. I've started full bootstrap but won't be online before tomorrow most probably.

It worked with the big testcase of the PCH of libstdc++ on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-07-09T09:41:45Z.
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-07-09T09:41:45Z.
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]