This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Fix: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-07-06T23:56:04Z.


Looks like it was Mark's patch introduced a warning:

+2003-07-06  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
+
+	PR c++/11345
+	* search.c (lookup_base_r): Remove is_non_public and
+	within_current_scope parameters.  Remove other dead code.
+	(lookup_base): Adjust call to lookup_base_r.
+	(adjust_result_of_qualified_name_lookup): Improve comment.
+	* semantics.c (finish_call_expr): Use maybe_dummy_object.

ChageLog:
2003-07-06  Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>

* search.c (dynamic_cast_base_recurse): Remove unused variable.

Patch:
Index: search.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/search.c,v
retrieving revision 1.270
diff -u -p -r1.270 search.c
--- search.c	6 Jul 2003 23:23:45 -0000	1.270
+++ search.c	7 Jul 2003 01:43:59 -0000
@@ -364,7 +364,6 @@ dynamic_cast_base_recurse (tree subtype,
   for (i = 0; i < n_baselinks; i++)
     {
       tree base_binfo = TREE_VEC_ELT (binfos, i);
-      tree base_access = TREE_VEC_ELT (accesses, i);
       int rval;

if (base_access != access_public_node)

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Sunday, Jul 6, 2003, at 21:03 US/Eastern, GCC regression checker wrote:

With your recent patch, GCC does not compile on:
 native
Attached is build output for those targets.

The build failures are new.

For more information, see http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/.
<ChangeLog.diff><native-log.txt>--
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
(via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]