This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 19 GCC regressions, 16 new, with your patch on 2003-07-01T21:17:02Z.
- From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
- To: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, aj at suse dot de, bkoz at redhat dot com, edelsohn at gnu dot org, ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, law at redhat dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com, pcarlini at unitus dot it, roger at eyesopen dot com, zack at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:53:38 -0700
- Subject: Re: 19 GCC regressions, 16 new, with your patch on 2003-07-01T21:17:02Z.
- References: <F6B5FEE3-AC36-11D7-A233-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> <C0029D69-ACA2-11D7-A319-000393A91CAA@apple.com>
My patch is exposing some other latent bug. I have a fix for it
and it works for powerpc-darwin. As soon as I finish dejagnu
test runs for gcc and gdb on linux, I'll send patch to gcc-patches.
-Devang
On Wednesday, July 2, 2003, at 8:35 AM, Devang Patel wrote:
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 7:43 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
they all have an comparison like this one:
< .stabs
"/Users/regress/tbox/cvs-gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/decl
-3.c",130,0,0,0
> .stabs "decl-3.h",130,0,0,0
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/decl-3.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
hmm... BINCL for main source file? That does not look good.
I'll look into this.
-Devang