This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:37:15 +0200
Subject: Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.
References: <20030627104422.GA21694@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <81463742-A8BA-11D7-997B-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>

> On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 06:44 US/Eastern, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >This is bit unfortunate.  Making one variables to be output under
> >assumption that other variable has been just output is quite ugly.
> >Because it is done after unit-at-a-time code has finished the work and
> >I already do care to output all needed nodes, perhaps it is safest to
> >disable varpoolizing in this late stage of compilation.
> >Does the attached patch work for you?
> 
> Yes the patch works.
> Thank you for looking into the problem.

Thanks.  I've installed the patch as obvious.  Sorry for the
inconvenience.

Honza
> 
> Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]