This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:15:01 -0400
Subject: Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.

On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 06:44 US/Eastern, Jan Hubicka wrote:

This is bit unfortunate.  Making one variables to be output under
assumption that other variable has been just output is quite ugly.
Because it is done after unit-at-a-time code has finished the work and
I already do care to output all needed nodes, perhaps it is safest to
disable varpoolizing in this late stage of compilation.
Does the attached patch work for you?


Yes the patch works.
Thank you for looking into the problem.

Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: 21 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-06-26T09:45:01Z.
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]