This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-06-24T13:15:02Z.

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:56:07 +0200
Subject: Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-06-24T13:15:02Z.
References: <200306241805.h5OI5uTD012711@gcc-regress.apple.com> <CE655EC5-A6A0-11D7-865B-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>

> 
> On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:05 US/Eastern, GCC regression checker 
> wrote:
> 
> >With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> >used to pass.  There are 2 new failures, and 4
> >failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> >have been fixed.
> >
> >The new failures are:
> >native gcc.sum gcc.dg/attr-used.c
> >native gcc.sum gcc.dg/pch/inline-1.c
> 
> Both of these looks like is related to one of the unit-at-a-time 
> changes.
I will try to double check, but these testcases are run at -O2 when
unit-at-a-time is disabled so it looks curious.

Honza
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>

References:
- 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-06-24T13:15:02Z.
  - From: GCC regression checker
- Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-06-24T13:15:02Z.
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]