This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-06-24T10:51:52Z.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, konqueror at gmx dot de
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:31:14 -0400
Subject: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-06-24T10:51:52Z.

This one is my fault, I forgot that you cannot disable a static variable that has the GTY(()) mark on it. I should really have checked this one.

ChangeLog:
2003-06-24  Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>

	* method.c: Move thunk_labelno outside of the ifdef of
	ASM_OUTPUT_DEF.

Patch:

Attachment: temp1.diff
Description: Binary data


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 08:01 US/Eastern, GCC regression checker wrote:

With your recent patch, GCC does not compile on:
 native
Attached is build output for those targets.
The last time the regression tests were run, GCC did not compile either, so the problem might not be caused by your patch.
For more information, see http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/.
<ChangeLog.diff><native-log.txt>--
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
(via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)

References:
- GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-06-24T10:51:52Z.
  - From: GCC regression checker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]