This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 5 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-06-06T00:02:32Z.
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, konqueror at gmx dot de, ljrittle at acm dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com, pbothner at apple dot com, pcarlini at unitus dot it, phil at jaj dot com, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
- Date: 06 Jun 2003 14:33:49 -0700
- Subject: Re: 5 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-06-06T00:02:32Z.
- References: <200306060447.h564lXIJ020766@gcc-regress.apple.com>
"GCC regression checker" <geoffk@apple.com> writes:
> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass. There are 2 new failures, and 3
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The new failures are:
> native g77.sum g77.f-torture/compile/20010321-1.f,
> native gcc.sum gcc.dg/warn-1.c
I don't understand how, but the first of these must be Per's patch.
The second of these I can't track down. I can't even tell if the
testcase is correct; the testcase claims there should be an extra
warning, but I don't know what kind.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>