This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-05-12T12:32:46Z.
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: jh at suse dot cz, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 15:01:39 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-05-12T12:32:46Z.
- References: <200305121250.h4CCoufO029676@gcc-regress.apple.com>
> With your recent patch, GCC does not compile on:
> native
> Attached is build output for those targets.
>
> /tmp/ccyzJO1Q.s:27992:Repeat < 0, .space ignored
> /tmp/ccyzJO1Q.s:27995:Repeat < 0, .space ignored
> /tmp/ccyzJO1Q.s:27997:Repeat < 0, .space ignored
> /tmp/ccyzJO1Q.s:28000:Repeat < 0, .space ignored
> /tmp/ccyzJO1Q.s:28002:Repeat < 0, .space ignored
This is deifnitely mine. What config file do you use? I would assume
that it is darwin but that one looks just fine.
#define ASM_OUTPUT_SKIP(FILE,SIZE) \
fprintf (FILE, "\t.space "HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNED"\n", SIZE)
SIZE is unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT because of my change. Perhaps a library
issue? Then my patch ineed have problem (we would probably need our own
function to print HOST_WIDE_INT then.
Honza
> make[2]: *** [c-parse.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [stage2_build] Error 2
> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
> + '[' -s gcc/.bad_compare ']'
> + exit 1
> --
> Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
> (via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)