This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-04-11T06:41:30Z.

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com, dave dot anglin at nrc-cnrc dot gc dot ca, davidc at freebsd dot org, redi at gcc dot gnu dot org, tromey at redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:21:57 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-04-11T06:41:30Z.

On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 09:35 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:

"GCC regression checker" <geoffk at apple dot com> writes:

With your recent patch, GCC does not compile on:
 native
Attached is build output for those targets.


I believe the appended patch should fix this bug, but I do not have
access to a Darwin system to verify it.  My apologies for not looking
thoroughly enough for remaining uses of IDENTIFIER_LOCAL_VALUE; this
really should be the last one.

This looks right, although I suspect that it's actually a bug that #pragma unused doesn't work on file-scope objects.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-04-11T06:41:30Z.
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-04-11T06:41:30Z.
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]