This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

2 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-02-23T04:05:29Z.

From: "GCC regression checker" <geoffk at apple dot com>
To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, green at redhat dot com, hp at axis dot com, jh at suse dot cz, joern dot rennecke at superh dot com, kelleycook at comcast dot net, mark at codesourcery dot com, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, roger at eyesopen dot com, s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl, schwab at suse dot de, wilson at tuliptree dot org, zack at codesourcery dot com, zlomekj at suse dot cz
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:20:08 +0000
Subject: 2 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-02-23T04:05:29Z.
Reply-to: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org

With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
used to pass.  There are 2 new failures, and 0
failures that existed before and after that patch; 2 failures
have been fixed.

The new failures are:
native gcc.sum gcc.dg/noreturn-1.c
native gcc.sum gcc.dg/return-type-1.c

The fixed failures are:
native gcc.sum gcc.dg/20020201-4.c
native gcc.sum gcc.dg/20020304-1.c

For more information, see http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/.

Attachment: ChangeLog.diff
Description: Text document

-- 
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com> 
(via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]