This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] libobjc and ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN rs6000 changes (was Re: 81 GCC regressions, 79 new, with your patch on 2002-08-07T23:24:57Z.)
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, aldyh at redhat dot com, geoffk at redhat dot com, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:41:33 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] libobjc and ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN rs6000 changes (was Re: 81 GCC regressions, 79 new, with your patch on 2002-08-07T23:24:57Z.)
- References: <rth@redhat.com> <200208081707.NAA30912@makai.watson.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 01:07:03PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I would really like to understand the reason for removing all of
> the original definitions of ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN in the PowerPC port. This
> seems completely unrelated to the bitfields fix. All that it has done is
> cause breakage and requires yet another GCC 3.2 pre-release.
Well, 2 bugs were discovered in it and with certain versions of the patch
it had to be modified everywhere, especially the TYPE_P () checking version
was quite too long for a macro.
Now that *_USER_ALIGN checking is done in stor-layout.c, I think I
should revert (but remove the #undef in sysv4.h too).
Jakub