This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 01:02:57PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> It causes small performance degradation and code size growth. Perhaps
> it is the register allocator not being able to produce the REG_EQUIV
> note as alias analysis is too weak?
I didn't think local-alloc tried to produce REG_EQUAL (and thus,
by promotion, REG_EQUIV) notes for memory at all.
r~
- References:
- 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
- From: GCC regression checker
- Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
- Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
- Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
- Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
- Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.
- Re: 6 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-07-20T23:26:42Z.