This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 27 GCC regressions, 27 new, with your patch on 2002-05-22T02:09:06Z.
- From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gniibe at m17n dot org, kazu at cs dot umass dot edu,law at redhat dot com, neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, rth at redhat dot com,vmakarov at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 19:56:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: 27 GCC regressions, 27 new, with your patch on 2002-05-22T02:09:06Z.
- References: <200205220555.g4M5t2N18363@maat.sfbay.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205221112320.6903-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
Hello.
> > With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> > used to pass. There are 27 new failures, and 0 failures that existed
> > before and after that patch.
>
> Has anyone taken responsibility for these regressions? Although I
> *really* doubt that it was my patch at fault, I'm currently rerunning
> bootstraps with and without my change just in case. Due diligence.
>
> Even if a solution isn't ready yet, pointing out the true source of
> these new failures will save me several CPU hours of detective work.
I'm almost sure they are not mine (they could be caused by unexpected
interaction with some later patch, though). Considering the place where the
gcc crashes appear I think the most probable source is
2002-05-21 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
* flow.c (life_analysis): Fix test for deleted label.
(Without really looking what the patch have done -- so sorry if I'm
wrong).
Zdenek