This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

10 GCC regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2002-01-31T01:12:36Z.

From: "GCC regression checker" <regress at maat dot cygnus dot com>
To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, ljrittle at acm dot org, pme at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com, schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de, toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl, tromey at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 03:46:40 +0000
Subject: 10 GCC regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2002-01-31T01:12:36Z.
Reply-to: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org

With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
used to pass.  There are 4 new failures, and 6
failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
have been fixed.

The new failures are:
powerpc-eabisim g++.sum g++.dg/ext/instantiate1.C
powerpc-eabisim g++.sum g++.dg/opt/vtgc1.C
native g++.sum g++.dg/ext/instantiate1.C
native g++.sum g++.dg/opt/vtgc1.C

The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, are:
powerpc-eabisim gdb.sum gdb.base/bitfields.exp:
powerpc-eabisim gdb.sum gdb.base/setvar.exp:
native gdb.sum gdb.base/bitfields.exp:
native gdb.sum gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp:
native gdb.sum gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp:
native gdb.sum gdb.base/setvar.exp:

For more information, see <http://people.redhat.com/geoffk/gcc-regression/>.

Attachment: ChangeLog.diff
Description: Text document

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]