This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: 10 GCC regressions, 8 new, with your patch on 2001-07-16T22:08:55Z.


"GCC regression checker" <regress@maat.cygnus.com> writes:

> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass.  There are 8 new failures, and 2
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
> 
> The new failures are:
> powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-7.c
> powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/comp-goto-2.c
> powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.dg/20000707-1.c
> powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.dg/unused-2.c
> native gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-7.c
> native gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/comp-goto-2.c
> native gcc.sum gcc.dg/20000707-1.c
> native gcc.sum gcc.dg/unused-2.c

Jan, these look like they might have been affected by the unneeded
code labels, PRE doesn't even touch the code for at least , so
it's not a load motion problem. :)

Building from a tree right before your basic block patch makes the
regressions go away.

--Dan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]