This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

2 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2000-10-12T10:05:00Z.

To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: 2 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2000-10-12T10:05:00Z.
From: "GCC regression checker" <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:27:26 +0000
CC: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk

(This is an automated message.)

With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
used to pass.  There are 0 new failures, and 2
failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
have been fixed.

The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, are:
gcc.sum gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c
gcc.sum gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c

A complete list of failures is attached.  Also attached is a diff of
the ChangeLog entries since the last time the regression tests passed,
on 2000-10-11T22:05:00Z.

For more information, see <http://www.cygnus.com/~geoffk/gcc-regression/>.

gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O0 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O1 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O2 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -g 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -Os 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O0 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O1 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O2 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -Os 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-fs-1.c scan-assembler-not
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-fs-1.c scan-assembler-not
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %hh in C90 (test for warnings, line 32)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %ll in C90 (test for warnings, line 33)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %j in C90 (test for warnings, line 34)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %z in C90 (test for warnings, line 35)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %t in C90 (test for warnings, line 36)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %F in C90 (test for warnings, line 38)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %a in C90 (test for warnings, line 39)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c %A in C90 (test for warnings, line 40)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c (test for excess errors)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %hh in C90 (test for warnings, line 33)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %ll in C90 (test for warnings, line 34)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %j in C90 (test for warnings, line 35)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %z in C90 (test for warnings, line 36)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %t in C90 (test for warnings, line 37)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %F in C90 (test for warnings, line 39)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %a in C90 (test for warnings, line 40)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c %A in C90 (test for warnings, line 41)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c (test for excess errors)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c func [] arg (test for errors, line 26)
gcc/testsuite/gcc.sum:FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c (test for excess errors)
gcc/testsuite/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
gcc/testsuite/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
gcc/testsuite/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.other/loop2.C caused compiler crash
gcc/testsuite/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.pt/static11.C  Execution test
gcc/testsuite/objc.sum:FAIL: objc/execute/np-1.m compilation,  -O 
gcc/testsuite/objc.sum:FAIL: objc/execute/np-2.m compilation,  -O 
powerpc-eabisim/libio/testsuite/libio.sum:FAIL: tFile.cc execution 
powerpc-eabisim/libio/testsuite/libio.sum:FAIL: tFile.cc execution -b0
powerpc-eabisim/libio/testsuite/libio.sum:FAIL: tFile.cc execution -b3
powerpc-eabisim/libio/testsuite/libio.sum:FAIL: tiomisc.cc output

--- /sloth/delay/tbox/changelog_pass/egcs/gcc/ChangeLog	Wed Oct 11 15:05:37 2000
+++ egcs/gcc/ChangeLog	Thu Oct 12 03:05:42 2000
@@ -1,3 +1,30 @@
+2000-10-12  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
+
+	* gcc.texi: Merge in contents of README.TRAD and TESTS.FLUNK.
+	* README.TRAD, TESTS.FLUNK: Remove.
+
+2000-10-12  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
+
+	* c-common.c (decl_attributes): Don't allow strftime formats with
+	first_arg_num nonzero.
+	(check_format_info): Set wanted_type and wanted_type_name to zero
+	before they are possibly assigned and used.
+
+2000-10-12  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
+
+	* c-common.c (scanf_flag_specs): Add flags ' and I.
+	(strftime_flag_pairs): Disallow any pair of the _, - and 0 flags,
+	or the ^ and # flags together.
+	(scan_char_table): Handle the ' and I flags.
+	(format_types): Add ' and I flags for scanf.
+
+2000-10-12  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
+
+	* c-common.c (print_char_table): Use the unpromoted type for
+	lengths "h" and "hh" with conversions dioxXu.
+	(check_format_types): Apply the default argument promotions where
+	the wanted type is not a pointer target.
+
 2000-10-11  Michael Meeks  <mmeeks@gnu.org>
             Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
 
--- /sloth/delay/tbox/changelog_pass/egcs/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog	Wed Oct 11 15:05:40 2000
+++ egcs/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog	Thu Oct 12 03:05:44 2000
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+2000-10-12  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
+
+	* gcc.dg/format-attr-1.c: New test.
+
+2000-10-12  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
+
+	* gcc.dg/c90-printf-2.c, gcc.dg/c90-scanf-2.c: Use
+	__LONG_LONG_MAX__ instead of LLONG_MAX.
+
+2000-10-12  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
+
+	* gcc.dg/c99-scanf-2.c, gcc.dg/format-ext-2.c: Test ' and I
+	scanf flags.
+	* gcc.dg/format-ext-3.c: Test mutually exclusive pairs of strftime
+	flags.
+
 2000-10-11  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
 
 	* gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c: New test.

-- 
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com> 
(via an automated GCC regression script.)

jsm28@cam.ac.uk

2000-10-12T10:05:00Z 2000-10-12T12:27:18Z regress-2

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]