This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
- From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 21 May 2003 11:26:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
- Reply-to: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>
The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: janis187@us.ibm.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
lloyd@acm.jhu.edu
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:15:13 +0200
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:42:30AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Is it illegal for the pc_thunk to go into %eax instead of %ecx in that case?
I don't know but there are apparently some gas/ld versions that make
a mess of it (see the rest of this thread). Even if it is a gas Bug we
may want to work around it.
regards Christian
--
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!