This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: other/9105: gcc-3.2.1/gcc/intl/Makefile gets incorrect INSTALL variable path
- From: "Vic Abell" <abe at purdue dot edu>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 21 May 2003 11:26:01 -0000
- Subject: RE: other/9105: gcc-3.2.1/gcc/intl/Makefile gets incorrect INSTALL variable path
- Reply-to: "Vic Abell" <abe at purdue dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR other/9105; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Vic Abell" <abe@purdue.edu>
To: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: "'Christian Ehrhardt'" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>,
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: other/9105: gcc-3.2.1/gcc/intl/Makefile gets incorrect INSTALL variable path
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 06:22:56 -0500
Erc,
You write:
>
> I wrote:
> >
> > Yes. No difference. The INSTALL string in gcc/intl/Makefile
> > is wrong if "/path/to/sources/configure" is relative; correct,
> > if it is absolute.
>
> So everything works fine unless you build in the src directory,
> doesn't it?
No. It makes no difference if the configure step is
run in-source or ex-source. If done ex-source with
a relative path, the gcc/intl/Makefile's INSTALL string
is missing one "../" component.