This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/10840: any way to catch a segmentation fault error?
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 18 May 2003 02:06:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/10840: any way to catch a segmentation fault error?
- Reply-to: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR c++/10840; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: snowboy@orgio.net
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
"Gcc-Bugs@Gcc. Gnu. Org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/10840: any way to catch a segmentation fault error?
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 22:02:31 -0400
No, this is a Microsoft extension, use signal(3) to catch seg faults.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
PS Can someone close this bug, as this extension is one which has
been discussed before and decided we do not want it.