This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
c++/10717: Performance issue in expand_static_init with large number of static initializors
- From: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 May 2003 19:27:17 -0000
- Subject: c++/10717: Performance issue in expand_static_init with large number of static initializors
- Reply-to: pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
>Number: 10717
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: Performance issue in expand_static_init with large number of static initializors
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Fri May 09 19:36:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Andrew Pinski
>Release: 3.4
>Organization:
>Environment:
powerpc-darwin (all really, does not matter).
>Description:
This is related to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR?10060 as the code is the same but the problem is different.
cp_finish_decl (cp/decl.c:8221) calls expand_static_init (cp/decl.c:8512) calls value_member and value_member looks though a linked list which is very ineffienct, a better way is to use a hashtable.
>How-To-Repeat:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/PR?10060 how to generate the file and compile it, it will ice when compiling (but that is the problem for that PR).
>Fix:
Use a hashtable instead of a linked list.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: