This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 9 May 2003 00:36:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
- Reply-to: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR c++/6758; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 19:30:59 -0500 (CDT)
> To be fair, the code is legal in 3.3 because of the implicit typename
> extension. I guess this bug should be kept open (not analyzed - there is
> no testcase), in case someone wants to fix the ICE in the 3.3 branch.
Well, why? The code ICEd since at least 2.95, so it's not a regression.
It's fixed on mainline. Bugs that are not regressions are not going to be
fixed on 3.3 branch, so why keep it open?
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/