This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/10661: [3.3/3.4? regression] ICE in instantiate_decl
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: giovannibajo at libero dot it
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 8 May 2003 16:26:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/10661: [3.3/3.4? regression] ICE in instantiate_decl
- Reply-to: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
The following reply was made to PR c++/10661; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <bangerth@dealii.org>,
<gawrilow@math.tu-berlin.de>,
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
<giovannibajo@libero.it>,
<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/10661: [3.3/3.4? regression] ICE in instantiate_decl
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 18:13:28 +0200
bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
> - it's a regression on 3.3. Code doesn't compile on 3.4,
> so I can't yet say what's on there
Ewgenij, I suggest you to try compiling your library with GCC 3.4 as well,
and submit testcases for it in case of failure. This is the right timeframe
to do so if you want to be absolutely sure your software will run in 3.4.0
as well. And as Wolfgang suggested, as a general rule of thumb, since you
have such a larger and complex codebase, you might want to upgrade GCC from
CVS every other week and check that everything always works.
Giovanni Bajo