This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/10646: [3.3/3.4 regression] non-const reference is incorrectly matched in a "const T" partial specialization
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 7 May 2003 00:26:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/10646: [3.3/3.4 regression] non-const reference is incorrectly matched in a "const T" partial specialization
- Reply-to: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
The following reply was made to PR c++/10646; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
<notbob@tessellation.com>,
<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/10646: [3.3/3.4 regression] non-const reference is incorrectly matched in a "const T" partial specialization
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 02:23:22 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10646
As an additional note, the same bug exists for any combination of
cv-qualifier. So, you can construct a template called is_volatile like the
above to reproduce the same bug.
Giovanni Bajo