This is the mail archive of the gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

c++/10641: -Wreturn-type does not work reliably


>Number:         10641
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       -Wreturn-type does not work reliably
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          accepts-illegal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue May 06 11:26:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Isabel Kock, Johannes Gajdosik
>Release:        gcc 2.95.3
>Organization:
>Environment:
hpux and linux, gcc 2.95.3

> g++ -v
Reading specs from /opt/gcc/lib/gcc-lib/hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20/2.95.3/specs
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)

g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/2.95.3/specs
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)
>Description:
Even with -Wreturn-type the compiler does not warn
when no return value is supplied,
see the following example (only 3 lines of code):

---- test.C begin ----
#include <string>
int f(string) {}
int g(const string &) {}
---- test.C end ---

> g++ -c -Wreturn-type test.C
test.C: In function `int g(const string &)':
test.C:3: warning: control reaches end of non-void function `g(const string &)'

The compiler warns about function g, but there is no
warning about function f.
>How-To-Repeat:
See Description
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]