This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/10446: ICE on a definition of a nonexistent member function of a nested class in a class template
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 21 Apr 2003 14:36:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/10446: ICE on a definition of a nonexistent member function of a nested class in a class template
- Reply-to: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
The following reply was made to PR c++/10446; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<kparz at iastate dot edu>,
<gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/10446: ICE on a definition of a nonexistent member function of a nested class in a class template
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:26:49 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
r=10446
Confirmed. It's an ICE on error recovery, present on 3.2/3.3/3.4. I rate
this as a regression since 2.95 was correctly recovering.
Giovanni Bajo