This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/10007: building the compiler fails with some javaproblem in spite of --enable-languages=c,c++,f77
- From: Gerhard Heinzel <ghh at mpq dot mpg dot de>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 17 Apr 2003 14:26:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/10007: building the compiler fails with some javaproblem in spite of --enable-languages=c,c++,f77
- Reply-to: Gerhard Heinzel <ghh at mpq dot mpg dot de>
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10007; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gerhard Heinzel <ghh at mpq dot mpg dot de>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: bootstrap/10007: building the compiler fails with some java
problem in spite of --enable-languages=c,c++,f77
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Maybe yes. But for this installation, I started in an new "objdir"
> > and did a "make clean", if I remember correctly. Any suggestions what I
> > could test here?
>
> Hmm... if the objdir was really new, you couldn't have done a 'make clean'
> since there is no Makefile :-)
>
> My wild guess is that the objdir was not new and you previously built with
> Java support enabled. Then you did 'make clean', re-configured but some
> scraps were left. I tested that this morning (even with 'make distclean') and
> I got a failure when building libjava too.
>
> I presume you managed to build the compiler anyway, using another fresh new
> objdir?
Thank you for your effort. It is a while ago that I had this problem,
and I had been busy with other things since, so I didn't try again.
It is well possible that your guess is right. I have not yet tried again,
since my gcc 3.2 is working fine. Actually I have removed the installation
directory in the meantime in some cleanup process. I think I will try
again only if (1) I really need 3.2.2, or (2) a new version appears, or
(3) there are additional tests I could do to assist your debugging.
With best greetings
Gerhard Heinzel