This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/10393: gcc does not generate code for loop
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 15 Apr 2003 19:06:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/10393: gcc does not generate code for loop
- Reply-to: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
The following reply was made to PR optimization/10393; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Dag Agren <dagren at abo dot fi>
Cc: <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: optimization/10393: gcc does not generate code for loop
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:00:07 +0200
> Hmm, trying to reproduce it myself from the .ii file fails. Also, the
> generated assembler output does not look familiar to what I got in my
> earlier tests. This is most confusing, as I did not save the orignal
> source file. Would gcc ever produce different output from a .cpp and the
> corresponding .ii file?
Certainly not, otherwise we would not be able to debug GCC at all.
Maybe you looked at a different but similar part of the assembly file the
first time? Or you used different compile options?
--
Eric Botcazou