This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: preprocessor/8505: cross cpp0 usePREFIX_INCLUDE_DIR=$prefix/include
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 4 Apr 2003 01:06:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: preprocessor/8505: cross cpp0 usePREFIX_INCLUDE_DIR=$prefix/include
- Reply-to: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/8505; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: benoit dot poulot-cazajou at jaluna dot com, stephane dot carbillet at jaluna dot com,
drow at mvista dot com
Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/8505: cross cpp0 use
PREFIX_INCLUDE_DIR=$prefix/include
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 17:05:20 -0800
[http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8505]
My apologies for letting this go for so long.
I am not expert in the domain of cross compilers, and I can think of
plausible reasons both to have the PREFIX_INCLUDE_DIR searched and
not to have it searched. It would be consistent with what is done
for other directories, like LOCAL_INCLUDE_DIR, not to search it;
however, it appears that this directory has been searched in cross
compilers since forever, so people might be depending on the existing
behavior.
I would appreciate opinions. Dan, I'm cc:ing you because you've had
your fingers in this area recently.
zw