This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: other/6955: collect2 says "core dumped" when there is no core
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- To: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 25 Mar 2003 16:46:02 -0000
- Subject: Re: other/6955: collect2 says "core dumped" when there is no core
- Reply-to: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR other/6955; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu
Cc: bruno at clisp dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org,
gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: other/6955: collect2 says "core dumped" when there is no core
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:43:25 -0500 (EST)
> From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
>
> > > Kaveh, you inserted the lines in question in this PR some
> > > 3.5 years ago. Would you mind to take a brief look at this
> > > report and its 1-line patch?
> >
> > Eh? I don't recall filing or modifying this PR. How did you
> > determine I was responsible?
>
> I _made_ you responsible :-) You weren't in any legal sense, I just looked
> at the output of "cvs annotate" to find out that you were the one who
> checked in the lines of question. This is by now one of the less
> successless ways to get patches in PRs reviewed ;-)
I hate to be a pedant, but now honor is at stake. :-)
I honestly don't think I introduced this error. Looking back at the
cvs logs, it came in through one of the many infamous gcc2 merges. It
came in over four years ago: "Merge in gcc2 snapshot 19980929".
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/collect2.c.diff?r1=1.62&r2=1.63
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu