This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/9853: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: drow at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 24 Mar 2003 04:06:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c/9853; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, mas at magica dot systems dot caltech dot edu,
gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:02:19 -0500
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:33:08PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> drow at sources dot redhat dot com writes:
>
> | Old Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
> | New Synopsis: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
> |
> | Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->drow
> | Responsible-Changed-By: drow
> | Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 12 17:15:38 2003
> | Responsible-Changed-Why:
> | I've checked in a fix to 3.3 and 3.4, so I'm changing the
> | title. The testcase from this bug still should be checked
> | in; the patch from this bug may be better than mine; and 3.2
> | is still unaddressed.
>
> Is there a chance to have your patch backported to 3.2 branch?
Certainly. I'd already tested the patch on 3.2, so I'm taking this as
approval (checked in now).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer