RE: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking f or shl_*

["BONNER,MATT \(HP-Vancouver,ex1\)" <matt dot bonner at hp dot com>]

The following reply was made to PR target/9843; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <matt dot bonner at hp dot com>
To: "'law at redhat dot com'" <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: 'John David Anglin' <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>,
	danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
	nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: RE: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking f
	 or  shl_*
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:15:37 -0500

 >> From: law at redhat dot com [mailto:law at redhat dot com]
 >> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:43 AM
 >> To: BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
 >> Cc: 'John David Anglin'; danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org; gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org;
 >> gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org; nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org; gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
 >> Subject: Re: target/9843: [HPUX] -static still leaves the linker looking
 f or shl_*
 >> 
 >> 
 >> In message 
 >> <A134E2426B46D711BB4B000347AE6E7C76EBBD at xvan02 dot vcd dot hp dot com>, "BONNER,
 MATT" writes:
 >>  >Hmmm...
 >>  >
 >>  >Maybe all is still not well.  When I move an executable compiled with
 >>  >all this stuff from an HP-UX 11 machine to an HP-UX machine, I get
 >>  >
 >>  >/usr/lib/dld.sl: Can't open shared library: /usr/lib/libdld.2
 >>  >/usr/lib/dld.sl: No such file or directory
 >>  >IOT trap
 >>  >
 >>  >I'm hunting around as I write this, but if you know what I'm doing
 >>  >wrong now, please let me know.  Or if the answer is "You can't run
 >>  >11 executables on 10." :-)
 >>
 >> You can't run hpux11 executables on an hpux10 system.
 
 Okay.  Bummer.  However, I'm still confused.  I thought all these -Wl,-E,+n
 commands were to link statically.  Why, then, is the executable looking for
 shared library libdld.2?
 
 thanks,
 Matt