This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: other/9245: Loop commands should return a value if they are aborted
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: Loop-commands at sources dot redhat dot com, should at sources dot redhat dot com, return at sources dot redhat dot com, a at sources dot redhat dot com, value at sources dot redhat dot com, if at sources dot redhat dot com, they at sources dot redhat dot com, are at sources dot redhat dot com, aborted at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, ville_jungman at hotmail dot com
- Date: 15 Mar 2003 18:53:51 -0000
- Subject: Re: other/9245: Loop commands should return a value if they are aborted
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, Loop-commands at sources dot redhat dot com, should at sources dot redhat dot com, return at sources dot redhat dot com, a at sources dot redhat dot com, value at sources dot redhat dot com, if at sources dot redhat dot com, they at sources dot redhat dot com, are at sources dot redhat dot com, aborted at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, ville_jungman at hotmail dot com, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: Loop commands should return a value if they are aborted
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 18:53:51 2003
State-Changed-Why:
I think the present mood is very much against random extension
to the language. If you think that your proposal is a good
idea, try to take it to the respective standard committees
and ask them to consider things. If approved, gcc will
then certainly integrate this.
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9245