This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/7543: Suggest new warning message for gcc
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 10 Mar 2003 20:56:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c/7543: Suggest new warning message for gcc
- Reply-to: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR c/7543; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/7543: Suggest new warning message for gcc
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:46:47 -0600 (CST)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:43:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Tom Truscott <trt at unx dot sas dot com>
To: bangerth at dealii dot org
Subject: Re: c/7543: Suggest new warning message for gcc
> Tom, did your patch get applied to CVS? What's the state of
> this?
I don't know if it was applied, but I strongly doubt it.
The state of this is totally defunct.
I have tried different request strategies for a few years
and have concluded that only if I become a gcc insider
can I get even the simplest changes made.
I don't have the time, energy, or interest in that.
I'm content with the dozens of a warnings I've added
to my personal copy of gcc, which I run daily
to spot problems in my company's product (20M+ LOC).
If there is a gcc insider who would like to shepherd
specific warning changes I will be happy to supply them.
Beyond that I'm not interested, not even in discussing this,
so feel to mark this bug NOFIX or whatever.
Thanks,
Tom Truscott