This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ada/9406: Documentation suggestion
- From: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
- To: bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 14:16:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: ada/9406: Documentation suggestion
- Reply-to: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
The following reply was made to PR ada/9406; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
To: Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com>
Cc: Simon Wright <simon at pushface dot org>, bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: ada/9406: Documentation suggestion
Date: 28 Feb 2003 01:07:22 +1100
>>>>> "Geert" == Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com> writes:
>> I see your point about partitions though I must say it was far from
>> obvious that I should be looking there. Perhaps the UM should have a
>> reference to the RM.
Geert> I now see what you mean. I agree that the language here could
Geert> be improved. Actually, the language from the Ada RM that I
Geert> quoted seems to be pretty clear, so I think we should borrow
Geert> from that or indeed put in a link (or both).
I'm not an Ada language lawyer, so the scope of this PR is a bit
beyond me now. I will commit the simple grammar fix and then put the
PR back into analysed state so that it can be finished off by one of
you fellows.
Cheers, Ben