This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 24 Feb 2003 16:56:02 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
- Reply-to: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
The following reply was made to PR optimization/9357; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org,
gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, maddinp at yahoo dot de
Subject: Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa
-funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:46:31 +0100
Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com> writes:
> The regression showed up with this patch:
>
> Sat Oct 27 12:12:09 CEST 2001 Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
>
> * cfgcleanup.c (merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps,
> merge_blocks_move_successors_nojumps): Set BB_UPDATE_LIFE.
> (merge_blocks): Properly udpate life after making edge nonfallthru.
> * cfgrtl.c (merge_blocks_nomove): Update global_live_at_end.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9357
This might be the case but -fssa is currently broken AFAIK and not
supported really, so if it cannot get reproduced without -fssa, I
really susspect a SSA issue,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de
private aj at arthur dot inka dot de
http://www.suse.de/~aj