This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/3187: gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 19 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/3187: gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors
- Reply-to: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c++/3187; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org,
peter at empeg dot com, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: c++/3187: gcc-3.0 prerelease lays down two copies of constructors
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:16:14 +0000
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3187
>
>
> This PR is _really_ old. Last modified over a year and a half ago, so it
> should go in feedback. It would be even better if this bug is fixed
> because it's a pretty serious bug IMO.
no. analyzed is the right state. Why do you think it serious? It does
not cause miscompilation or reject legal code.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan at codesourcery dot com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan at acm dot org