This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 13 Jan 2003 22:56:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug
- Reply-to: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
The following reply was made to PR c++/9278; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com>
Cc: <bangerth@dealii.org>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:47:47 +0000 (GMT)
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#18
Another obscure difference between C and C++. In C you can use a typedef
to void here <http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_157.html>.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk