This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/8108: Problem in the code generator for C and the linker isextremelly slow
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 8 Jan 2003 14:36:10 -0000
- Subject: Re: c/8108: Problem in the code generator for C and the linker isextremelly slow
- Reply-to: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR c/8108; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/8108: Problem in the code generator for C and the linker is
extremelly slow
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:26:03 -0600 (CST)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 09:04:13 +0100
From: Manuel Serrano <Manuel.Serrano@sophia.inria.fr>
To: bangerth@dealii.org
Subject: Re: c/8108: Problem in the code generator for C and the linker is
extremelly slow
> Unfortunately, your report does not contain a self-contained
> testcase, i.e. a file (including a main function) that when
> compiled with a different set of flags or with a different
> compiler produces differing output. Please take a look at
> the bug reporting instructions at the gcc homepage
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/).
>
> Regarding the long linker times: this is likely a problem
> with the linker, not with gcc. Did you observe the
> slowdown on the _same_ machine, i.e. using the same linker
> but different versions of the linker? Or was that on
> different machines with different linkers?
Sorry, as I have said in my previous mail, the problem was too essential:
Gcc3.2 (or the linker) was simply not usable for me as is. I have downgraded
to gcc2.95 since a long time and I don't have access anymore to any
gcc3.2xxx releases. Sorry but I can't help anymore.
--
Manuel