This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/7227: [<3.2/3.3> regression]: bogus code generation with attribute mode TI
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 2 Jan 2003 22:46:02 -0000
- Subject: Re: c/7227: [<3.2/3.3> regression]: bogus code generation with attribute mode TI
- Reply-to: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
The following reply was made to PR c/7227; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de,
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/7227: [<3.2/3.3> regression]: bogus code generation with attribute
mode TI
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 14:41:13 -0800
The warning is issued for the current (20031231) mainline
and 3.3 branch compilers for a 32-bit compiler on a
powerpc64-linux system, but not for 64-bit cross or native
compilers on the same system. It's also not seen for
ia64-linux.
Why is the class "wrong-code" and the the synopsis "bogus
code generation" when in fact it's an incorrect warning,
not incorrect code?
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7227