This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: Re: other/9031
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 28 Dec 2002 09:26:02 -0000
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: other/9031
- Reply-to: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
The following reply was made to PR other/9031; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, dave.anglin@nrc.ca,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, neroden@twcny.rr.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: other/9031
Date: 28 Dec 2002 07:15:53 -0200
On Dec 28, 2002, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 2002-12-28 John David Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc.ca>
>> * configure (LD): Improve test for gcc and try to set LD to the ld
>> used by gcc when using gcc and not doing a Canadian Cross.
> Ok, but I wouldn't mind if you waited for Nathan's patch to go in
> before adjusting yours. If you agree, consider the updated patch
> pre-approved, but please post it, for the record.
In fact, consider now sinclude()ing libtool.m4 and using its
AC_PROG_LD macro.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer